Good information; No practical application; no minimal competency standards
As a Doctor of Health science and an owner of a facility whose mission statement is: In collaboration with other healthcare professionals, we enhance the well-being of our clients through restorative exercise, I was disappointed that there was a zero practical application proficiency examination.
I became a PN1 practitioner because in order to recommend this certification to my staff and/or co-treat with a PN1 nutrition coach, I myself must understand the information, education, and instruction of the PN1 certification.
At the end of the course I can honestly say that I was informed about nutrition coaching, however because there is zero practical application I do not have a deep understanding of the subject matter, nor am I ready, trained. Proficient, and efficient.
I must contextualize the above by stating that although there is an attempt to encourage the PN candidate via practical exercises and case studies throughout the course, it was on a voluntary basis.
To paraphrase Socrates, knowledge is not power, but rather it is the application of the knowledge that is powerful because the application leads to understanding.
In summary, the course is informational and educational but due to a lack of a mandatory practical it is not, in my opinion, instructional and as such my concern is that there are no standards imposed by precision nutrition to ensure at least a minimal level of competency.
Thank you in n advance for reading my review.