I'd choose 2.5 starts if
I'd choose 2.5 starts if that was an option. Generally, I thought the 4-person panels were ineffective. They were not coordinated conversations, rather it was mostly individuals talking in silos. Beyond that, there was way too much content on AI (to the point speakers were cracking jokes about it). Finally, I get that suppliers do a lot to fund the conference, but always funneling non-suppliers to the booths for every break or meal was too much. Put some of the stand-up cocktail tables in the lobby area away from supplier booths. Overall, I was looking for an event that I'd send a more junior member of my team to each year, but I do not think this was it.